Social security and social networking

We often hear the phrase ‘care in the community’ in the UK. Nationalisation of social care has displaced traditional care by family and local community to some degree. Long ago, people who needed to be looked after were looked after by those who are related or socially close, either by geography or association. It could be again, and may even be necessary as care rationing is a strong likelihood.

Wealth is being redefined, with high quality social relationships becoming recognised as valuable and a major contributor to overall quality of life.

OK, in a roundabout way, what I am getting to is that social care costs money, and will be rationed, so why not link it back to social structure as it used to be. Those with social wealth could and perhaps should be cared for by those who love them instead of by the state. They would likely be happier, and it would cost less. Those that have low connectedness, i.e. few friends and family, should then be the rightful focus state care. Everyone could be cared for better and the costs would be more manageable.

We know people’s social connectedness by many means, and every year it gets easier. The numbers and strength of contacts on social networking sites is one clue, so is email and messaging use, so is phone use. Geographic proximity can of course be determined by information in the electoral roll. So it is possible to determine algorithms based on these many various factors that would determine who needs care from the state and who should be able to get it from social contacts.

Many people wouldn’t like that, resenting having to care for other people, so how can we make sure people do take care of those they are ‘allocated’ to? Well, that could be done by linking taxation to the care system in such a way that the amount of care you should be providing would be determined by your social connectivity, and providing that care yields tax discount. Or you could just pay your full quota of taxes and abdicate provision to the state. But by providing a high valuation on actual care, it would encouraged people to choose to provide care rather than to pay the tax.

Social wealth would this be linked to social tax, and this social tax could be paid either as care or cash. The technology of social networking has given us the future means to link the social care side of social security into social connectedness. Those who are socially poor would receive the greatest focus of state provision and those who gain most socially from their lives would have to put more in too. We do that with money, why not also with social value? Sounds fair to me.

2 responses to “Social security and social networking

  1. Okay, it’s a really thought provoking suggestion.
    I’d like to point out some concerns (I used to work in Wocial Servies and I’ve also been a carer, so I’m not totally ignorant about this stuff).
    Not everyone is suited to providing care for others. I take on board what you say about paying tax instead and that seems reasonable until you think about those people who keep disabled or elderly relatives in order to ‘care’ for them at home, but are in fact much more interested in the benefits they can claim than the welfare of the people they care for. (This isn’t just scare mongering, I’ve seen it happen and been deeply frustrated at how little I ould do about it).
    So I think there could be a problem with people being ‘cared for’ for tax purposes and, in fact, receiving very little care.
    Having said that, I suppose you could have some form of inspectorate in order to ensure that standards were maintianed (although that in itself could be expensive if it was to be properly staffed and resourced).
    In conclusion, I’m right with you when you mention the need to attach a high valuation on actual care. We should be doing this right now.


  2. Pingback: Capitalism 2.0 | Your guide to the future

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.